Fish & Richardson on X: "Join us at @IPO #IPChatChannel: Secondary Considerations: Latest Guideposts. The panel will review and analyze the latest judicial guideposts regarding the role and weight of objective indicia
Congratulations to Fisch Sigler LLP and Alan Fisch, Bill Sigler, Jeffrey Saltman, Ken Fung for being on top in numerous categories in our Patent... | By Patexia | Facebook
![Establishing Nexus between Secondary Consideration Evidence and the Invention - McBee Moore & Vanik IP, LLC Establishing Nexus between Secondary Consideration Evidence and the Invention - McBee Moore & Vanik IP, LLC](https://www.mmviplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/invention-nexus-01-1024x638.jpg)
Establishing Nexus between Secondary Consideration Evidence and the Invention - McBee Moore & Vanik IP, LLC
![Federal Circuit Clarifies the Nexus Requirement for Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness | Haug Partners LLP - JDSupra Federal Circuit Clarifies the Nexus Requirement for Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness | Haug Partners LLP - JDSupra](https://www.intellectualpropertypulse.com/thumbs/large/e/2/e/e2e672ecd60eb17f08251ff2b490595f130091ab.jpg)
Federal Circuit Clarifies the Nexus Requirement for Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness | Haug Partners LLP - JDSupra
![CAFC Clarifies Proving “Nexus” for Objective Indicia in a Design Patent Case | At the PTAB Blog | Finnegan | Leading IP+ Law Firm CAFC Clarifies Proving “Nexus” for Objective Indicia in a Design Patent Case | At the PTAB Blog | Finnegan | Leading IP+ Law Firm](https://www.finnegan.com/a/web/bktxx8FA4sGdN8SWh2kxFq/36G3eW/at-the-ptab-blog-cafc-clarifies-proving-nexus-082621.jpg)
CAFC Clarifies Proving “Nexus” for Objective Indicia in a Design Patent Case | At the PTAB Blog | Finnegan | Leading IP+ Law Firm
![PTAB Provides Guidance on Secondary Considerations of Nonobviousness in Precedential Decision - McBee Moore & Vanik IP, LLC PTAB Provides Guidance on Secondary Considerations of Nonobviousness in Precedential Decision - McBee Moore & Vanik IP, LLC](https://www.mmviplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/AdobeStock_183058933.jpeg)
PTAB Provides Guidance on Secondary Considerations of Nonobviousness in Precedential Decision - McBee Moore & Vanik IP, LLC
![Last Week In The Federal Circuit (February 14-18): When Objective Indicia Evidence Both Is, And Is Not, Sufficient For Non-Obviousness | Federal Circuit Blog - News & Statistics | Federal Circuitry Last Week In The Federal Circuit (February 14-18): When Objective Indicia Evidence Both Is, And Is Not, Sufficient For Non-Obviousness | Federal Circuit Blog - News & Statistics | Federal Circuitry](https://media2.mofo.com/v3/images/blt5775cc69c999c255/blta41c6c0fa124cb96/627316f24d9f8929712901df/2_24_smartphone_blog_image.jpg?format=auto&quality=60&width=700)
Last Week In The Federal Circuit (February 14-18): When Objective Indicia Evidence Both Is, And Is Not, Sufficient For Non-Obviousness | Federal Circuit Blog - News & Statistics | Federal Circuitry
![Objective Indicia of Non-obviousness Shine as Primary Consideration in PTAB Decision, PTAB Litigation Blog | Insights | Jones Day Objective Indicia of Non-obviousness Shine as Primary Consideration in PTAB Decision, PTAB Litigation Blog | Insights | Jones Day](https://www.jonesday.com/-/media/images/publications/2017/02/objective-indicia-of-nonobviousness-shine-as-prima/extensionceogimageoverride/indicia.jpg?rev=311adb84f19a4c52a08f1e2ee1ead235&sc_lang=en&hash=1950D929AA3E90AF82D37CE16FA7474C)
Objective Indicia of Non-obviousness Shine as Primary Consideration in PTAB Decision, PTAB Litigation Blog | Insights | Jones Day
![Critical Aspects of Invention Need to Be Claimed for Secondary Indicia to Stick | Patents Post-Grant Critical Aspects of Invention Need to Be Claimed for Secondary Indicia to Stick | Patents Post-Grant](https://images.bannerbear.com/direct/y0aJ23zRDdqMxX4OGl/requests/000/040/244/284/5R7NlW8nEzjpL5gKQmvbxgLyP/e7b9131589effcb22891bb98ffe0eebfdee88fe8.png)